Thomas Clarence Motter
Department of Linguistics
AD
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Would Take Again
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
21.7%
18.1%
14.5%
10.9%
7.2%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks
Loading...

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: A+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Feb. 11, 2026

I loved taking this class, and the format was honestly super helpful. The grading breakdown is very clear and fair: two non-cumulative exams worth 20% each, homework worth 30%, a final paper worth 20%, a proposal (5%) and presentation (5%), plus 2% extra credit available through SONA participation. There is also a 96-hour late policy, which is super generous and takes a lot of stress off.
In terms of the exams, they were very spot on with the lectures and mainly covered the most important aspects. Before every exam, Thomas does a full review, and that review tends to closely reflect what actually shows up on the test. He makes it pretty clear what to focus on, which makes studying feel focused rather than overwhelming.
As for the homework, it was not stressful at all. I never needed to use the late policy because the assignments were straightforward and easy to complete using his lectures. Everything felt manageable and directly connected to what we were learning in class.

The final project is also very doable. The proposal and presentation are only 5% each, and it does not have to be an experiment you actually run, just a well-developed idea. There is a short Q&A portion, which is not intimidating. If other students do not ask questions, Thomas will step in. His questions can sometimes sound more intellectual than expected, but he seems to grade based on effort and whether you understand your own material.
Overall, I would not judge the course based only on the grade distribution, since a lot of people did not attend class regularly. Thomas genuinely seemed interested in answering questions, stayed after class to help, and was consistently supportive during office hours. There was even a student who never attended in person and missed her assigned presentation day, and he still let her present later. He is a pretty cool professor, and I would definitely recommend taking his class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: A+
Feb. 11, 2026

I loved taking this class, and the format was honestly super helpful. The grading breakdown is very clear and fair: two non-cumulative exams worth 20% each, homework worth 30%, a final paper worth 20%, a proposal (5%) and presentation (5%), plus 2% extra credit available through SONA participation. There is also a 96-hour late policy, which is super generous and takes a lot of stress off.
In terms of the exams, they were very spot on with the lectures and mainly covered the most important aspects. Before every exam, Thomas does a full review, and that review tends to closely reflect what actually shows up on the test. He makes it pretty clear what to focus on, which makes studying feel focused rather than overwhelming.
As for the homework, it was not stressful at all. I never needed to use the late policy because the assignments were straightforward and easy to complete using his lectures. Everything felt manageable and directly connected to what we were learning in class.

The final project is also very doable. The proposal and presentation are only 5% each, and it does not have to be an experiment you actually run, just a well-developed idea. There is a short Q&A portion, which is not intimidating. If other students do not ask questions, Thomas will step in. His questions can sometimes sound more intellectual than expected, but he seems to grade based on effort and whether you understand your own material.
Overall, I would not judge the course based only on the grade distribution, since a lot of people did not attend class regularly. Thomas genuinely seemed interested in answering questions, stayed after class to help, and was consistently supportive during office hours. There was even a student who never attended in person and missed her assigned presentation day, and he still let her present later. He is a pretty cool professor, and I would definitely recommend taking his class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (1)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Would Take Again
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!