Thomas Maierhofer
Department of Statistics
AD
3.5
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 3.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
20.8%
17.3%
13.9%
10.4%
6.9%
3.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

22.2%
18.5%
14.8%
11.1%
7.4%
3.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks
Loading...

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2025
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Nov. 10, 2025

Great professor with clear teaching style and slides! Homeworks were relevant to material taught in class. There were some challenge questions that required thought but they were extremely manageable. Office hours were often helpful and he held review office hours for people to review their midterm answers and ask questions.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: B-
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Oct. 30, 2025

I took this class as a major requirement, and it was overall ok. His lectures consisted of slides that he created and were basically just him going over his slides, going over a couple of examples on RStudio. The tests were pretty hard as he straight up made it known that his tests were made so that most people would score a 50%. His tests have an MCQ portion and a section in which you must manually write out the code, so he recommends practicing writing out code when doing your homework and such. He at least gives us access to practice midterms and finals. The TAs were amazing and held midterm/final review sessions, offered in person and through Zoom. In each section, you have a discussion assignment that you work on and go over in class that is due the next week. There were also graded quizzes that were taken on Canvas with no time limit and were open-book. My quarter was the first time he implemented a group project, one that he did not give us a good rubric for, so my group and I were pretty lost. The first time he graded it, he gave us a really low score, harshly criticizing our work, but regraded it as he admitted that he did not provide a good rubric, but said he stood by the comments he had made before. Overall, this class was stressful, but at least he grades on a curve.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Summer 2025
Grade: A+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Oct. 30, 2025

This class was pretty light; even though there was technically assigned class times and discussion sections, I didn't go to most of them because I was a camp counselor, and it didn't end up mattering too much. I was able to learn most of the content just reading the slides. The final project was really open-ended where you could make anything you wanted as long as it included R programming. I do remember the exams being a bit tricky, especially because you had to code on paper, without R studio letting us know if the code compiled. But overall, the class was manageable and I felt like I really learned a lot.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2025
Grade: A
Nov. 10, 2025

Great professor with clear teaching style and slides! Homeworks were relevant to material taught in class. There were some challenge questions that required thought but they were extremely manageable. Office hours were often helpful and he held review office hours for people to review their midterm answers and ask questions.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: B-
Oct. 30, 2025

I took this class as a major requirement, and it was overall ok. His lectures consisted of slides that he created and were basically just him going over his slides, going over a couple of examples on RStudio. The tests were pretty hard as he straight up made it known that his tests were made so that most people would score a 50%. His tests have an MCQ portion and a section in which you must manually write out the code, so he recommends practicing writing out code when doing your homework and such. He at least gives us access to practice midterms and finals. The TAs were amazing and held midterm/final review sessions, offered in person and through Zoom. In each section, you have a discussion assignment that you work on and go over in class that is due the next week. There were also graded quizzes that were taken on Canvas with no time limit and were open-book. My quarter was the first time he implemented a group project, one that he did not give us a good rubric for, so my group and I were pretty lost. The first time he graded it, he gave us a really low score, harshly criticizing our work, but regraded it as he admitted that he did not provide a good rubric, but said he stood by the comments he had made before. Overall, this class was stressful, but at least he grades on a curve.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Summer 2025
Grade: A+
Oct. 30, 2025

This class was pretty light; even though there was technically assigned class times and discussion sections, I didn't go to most of them because I was a camp counselor, and it didn't end up mattering too much. I was able to learn most of the content just reading the slides. The final project was really open-ended where you could make anything you wanted as long as it included R programming. I do remember the exams being a bit tricky, especially because you had to code on paper, without R studio letting us know if the code compiled. But overall, the class was manageable and I felt like I really learned a lot.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.5
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 3.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!