Tomasz Marek Sadzik
Department of Economics
AD
3.4
Overall Rating
Based on 13 Users
Easiness 2.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
22.3%
18.6%
14.9%
11.2%
7.4%
3.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

24.7%
20.6%
16.5%
12.3%
8.2%
4.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

26.4%
22.0%
17.6%
13.2%
8.8%
4.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

24.4%
20.3%
16.2%
12.2%
8.1%
4.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.1%
24.2%
19.4%
14.5%
9.7%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.9%
24.9%
19.9%
14.9%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (12)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2018
Grade: B
June 25, 2018

Sadzik is a great Professor and guy. He genuinely cares about his students and provides you with a lot of resources to be successful. Would have preferred there to be more structure in the form of practice problems given over the course of the class as opposed to just right before exams. Class relied too heavily on his lectures/lecture notes that are nothing more than dense game theory. More practice problems would have made the material easier to digest. Also, this class ended up being reverse curved which was disappointing for the GPA :(

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: A
June 24, 2017

His lecture is engaging and funny, with lots of real world examples.

He posts lecture notes, so use them to study if you don't go to lecture. Notes are detailed, but I still recommend to go to lecture. (Some examples can not be understood unless you see him explain to you in person)

Midterm is straightforward (easier than homework). Final is significantly harder that asks you to think back and forth.

Curve is generous enough. In general, 80%+ is A.

Econ 106GL is graded differently from Econ 106G. For lab discussions, attendance is required, and you also need to do a group project (Econ in Action). The project applies Game Theory to real world examples. It is fun.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2018
Grade: B
June 25, 2018

Sadzik is a great Professor and guy. He genuinely cares about his students and provides you with a lot of resources to be successful. Would have preferred there to be more structure in the form of practice problems given over the course of the class as opposed to just right before exams. Class relied too heavily on his lectures/lecture notes that are nothing more than dense game theory. More practice problems would have made the material easier to digest. Also, this class ended up being reverse curved which was disappointing for the GPA :(

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: A
June 24, 2017

His lecture is engaging and funny, with lots of real world examples.

He posts lecture notes, so use them to study if you don't go to lecture. Notes are detailed, but I still recommend to go to lecture. (Some examples can not be understood unless you see him explain to you in person)

Midterm is straightforward (easier than homework). Final is significantly harder that asks you to think back and forth.

Curve is generous enough. In general, 80%+ is A.

Econ 106GL is graded differently from Econ 106G. For lab discussions, attendance is required, and you also need to do a group project (Econ in Action). The project applies Game Theory to real world examples. It is fun.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
3.4
Overall Rating
Based on 13 Users
Easiness 2.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!