Troy D. Smith
Department of Economics
AD
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 33 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.1 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tough Tests
  • Would Take Again
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
13.7%
11.4%
9.1%
6.8%
4.6%
2.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (22)

3 of 3
3 of 3
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: N/A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 16, 2017

The problem sets each week were manageable, and the lectures were ok although extremely fast paced. The tests, on the other hand, I found to be extremely difficult. Midterm 1 was fair, and the average was a C, midterm 2 was unbelievably difficult, and the average was around a 35%. The final I also thought was very challenging. Multiple choice questions are hard, and he gives out zero practice for them. The free response was ok, but its very tough to remember all of the information for each type of problem as most of it you need to teach yourself since his lectures are so fast-paced.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: A
June 16, 2017

I got a pretty good grade in this class, but I would've struggled if I didn't have a good sense of econ to begin with. This professors lectures are boring and hard to focus on. He writes pretty small on the board so its often hard to see. You can get his slides online, but you should go to lecture to take notes on the problems he does on the board. Don't buy the textbook. His tests are pretty closely related to the problem set he gives out, but there is often a little twist on one or two of the problems on the exams, and his multiple choice require a pretty full coverage knowledge of the material. (Tests are about 50/50 multiple choice and written problems). All in all, not bad at all if you are good at econ, but beware that the grade distribution for midterm 2 was a 56% and up was an A.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: N/A
June 16, 2017

The problem sets each week were manageable, and the lectures were ok although extremely fast paced. The tests, on the other hand, I found to be extremely difficult. Midterm 1 was fair, and the average was a C, midterm 2 was unbelievably difficult, and the average was around a 35%. The final I also thought was very challenging. Multiple choice questions are hard, and he gives out zero practice for them. The free response was ok, but its very tough to remember all of the information for each type of problem as most of it you need to teach yourself since his lectures are so fast-paced.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: A
June 16, 2017

I got a pretty good grade in this class, but I would've struggled if I didn't have a good sense of econ to begin with. This professors lectures are boring and hard to focus on. He writes pretty small on the board so its often hard to see. You can get his slides online, but you should go to lecture to take notes on the problems he does on the board. Don't buy the textbook. His tests are pretty closely related to the problem set he gives out, but there is often a little twist on one or two of the problems on the exams, and his multiple choice require a pretty full coverage knowledge of the material. (Tests are about 50/50 multiple choice and written problems). All in all, not bad at all if you are good at econ, but beware that the grade distribution for midterm 2 was a 56% and up was an A.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
3 of 3
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 33 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.1 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (22)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (11)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (14)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (10)
  • Tough Tests
    (13)
  • Would Take Again
    (14)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!