Vanessa Thulsiraj
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
AD
4.2
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 3.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Often Funny
  • Would Take Again
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
65.2%
54.3%
43.5%
32.6%
21.7%
10.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

51.4%
42.9%
34.3%
25.7%
17.1%
8.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

24.0%
20.0%
16.0%
12.0%
8.0%
4.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (4)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2021
Grade: A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
March 14, 2021

Although I think Professor Thulsiraj is a nice person, sometimes it seems that she is unsure of what she is lecturing about. This in turn makes the presentations a little confusing.

Also, although the tests are manageable, I feel like a lot of the information was not presented in an engaging way. For example, watching a 2 hour lecture on the different cycles where she just lists off the different processes doesn't encourage learning at all. Later, she'll ask questions in different lectures about the cycles like we're supposed to remember the specific cycle she probably lectured on for 30 seconds and is one out of like 20 processes.

I appreciate that she did make this class open note, but I just felt that I was memorizing material at times without knowledge of its applications or why we should care.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A
Jan. 6, 2021

This class is great, and Vanessa is an amazing professor! CEE M166 is like a continuation of a life science microbio class, but more in-depth with a focus on biogeochemical cycles and contaminants. It may sound difficult, but Vanessa is a great lecturer who makes the material very digestible and the exams were pretty easy. I definitely recommend this class!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A
April 11, 2020

Professor Thulsiraj is a really nice professor however the course was a bit disorganized. Homeworks were easy and manageable, the course also had a project component which was not too bad (actually was really interesting). Exams reflected homework. Only thing is the class contains A LOT of material so it can be a lot to cram in. Would recommend!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2021
Grade: A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
May 11, 2021

Dr. Thulsiraj is one of the best professors I have ever had! She is super nice and helpful and will make sure you understand the material. She will go out of her way to meet with you if you have questions about the content or just want to learn more about engineering! She is wonderful! Tests and HW were not easy but they were definitely fair and doable.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Winter 2021
Grade: A
March 14, 2021

Although I think Professor Thulsiraj is a nice person, sometimes it seems that she is unsure of what she is lecturing about. This in turn makes the presentations a little confusing.

Also, although the tests are manageable, I feel like a lot of the information was not presented in an engaging way. For example, watching a 2 hour lecture on the different cycles where she just lists off the different processes doesn't encourage learning at all. Later, she'll ask questions in different lectures about the cycles like we're supposed to remember the specific cycle she probably lectured on for 30 seconds and is one out of like 20 processes.

I appreciate that she did make this class open note, but I just felt that I was memorizing material at times without knowledge of its applications or why we should care.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A
Jan. 6, 2021

This class is great, and Vanessa is an amazing professor! CEE M166 is like a continuation of a life science microbio class, but more in-depth with a focus on biogeochemical cycles and contaminants. It may sound difficult, but Vanessa is a great lecturer who makes the material very digestible and the exams were pretty easy. I definitely recommend this class!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A
April 11, 2020

Professor Thulsiraj is a really nice professor however the course was a bit disorganized. Homeworks were easy and manageable, the course also had a project component which was not too bad (actually was really interesting). Exams reflected homework. Only thing is the class contains A LOT of material so it can be a lot to cram in. Would recommend!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Winter 2021
Grade: A
May 11, 2021

Dr. Thulsiraj is one of the best professors I have ever had! She is super nice and helpful and will make sure you understand the material. She will go out of her way to meet with you if you have questions about the content or just want to learn more about engineering! She is wonderful! Tests and HW were not easy but they were definitely fair and doable.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.2
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 3.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (2)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (1)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (2)
  • Often Funny
    (1)
  • Would Take Again
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!