- Home
- Search
- William Rogers Brubaker
- SOCIOL 1
AD
Based on 46 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Needs Textbook
- Participation Matters
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
If you're gonna take SOCIO1, definitely take it with Brubaker. It's about as clear of an introductory class (and GE) as you're gonna get, even if you don't like the subject material. He has very clear lecture slides (and lectures are Bruincast!) and makes it very clear what is expected. I would recommend going to lecture though because he has two or three iclicker questions each day about the readings (which means you do have to at least skim them or have someone give you the lowdown). Midterm, one 4 page paper, and a final, very manageable and grading depends on TA. Tl;dr - attendance is important, take this course with this professor.
Sociology 1 Course reader is so freaking expensive ($75 at the broxton store!!) but you seriously need it for the readings because there's reading quizzes every single lecture. I'm selling mine (lightly used) for $25.
Email me at *************
Nothing in this class ever felt clear. Between Brubaker and the TA's everything was presented and graded very arbitrarily and vaguely. Everyone in my discussion section did very poorly on the midterm and when we asked our TA about it, he went into detail about one particular question naming every single thing you would need to get a 10/10 on it. Many of us had all of those things but still ended up with a 6-7.5/10. You are expected to take the question given on the test and synthesis EVERYTHING you have ever learned ever and make it applicable (over exaggerating a bit, but it's how it felt) . Extremely unfair.
Also - clickers. They're meant to be an easy grade boost, but can end up screwing you over. Dense, vague material paired with extremely boring reading. The overall concepts are extremely interesting and made me view the world differently but it was as if it didn't matter because demonstrating it to get a good mark was so difficult. Brubaker isn't very approachable, which makes his lack of transparency and clarity an even bigger barrier. Would not recommend this class.
This has been one of my favorite classes I have taken at UCLA so far. The professor is extremely passionate about the material which keeps the lectures lively and entertaining. The things you learn in this class are very applicable to real life and make you see the world in a different way. I am currently undecided and this class has led me to consider Sociology as my major : )
Ok...So professor Brubaker seems like a nice guy, but this class isn't a shoe in for an A. I went to every lecture, got 100% on the iClicker questions, really understood the material, but got a B+. The tests are long and short answer and THERE IS NO FUCKING RUBRIC! The TAs grade arbitrarily. Like they'll read your answer and decide "this was good, not perfect, 7.5 out of 10." What they don't realize is that by giving out 7.5/10 on basically every question you get a fucking C on the tests. I went in to office hours to figure out how to do better on the test and I didn't really get an answer. Nice guy, boring lectures, mandatory attendance. so.. ya...
If you're gonna take SOCIO1, definitely take it with Brubaker. It's about as clear of an introductory class (and GE) as you're gonna get, even if you don't like the subject material. He has very clear lecture slides (and lectures are Bruincast!) and makes it very clear what is expected. I would recommend going to lecture though because he has two or three iclicker questions each day about the readings (which means you do have to at least skim them or have someone give you the lowdown). Midterm, one 4 page paper, and a final, very manageable and grading depends on TA. Tl;dr - attendance is important, take this course with this professor.
Sociology 1 Course reader is so freaking expensive ($75 at the broxton store!!) but you seriously need it for the readings because there's reading quizzes every single lecture. I'm selling mine (lightly used) for $25.
Email me at *************
Nothing in this class ever felt clear. Between Brubaker and the TA's everything was presented and graded very arbitrarily and vaguely. Everyone in my discussion section did very poorly on the midterm and when we asked our TA about it, he went into detail about one particular question naming every single thing you would need to get a 10/10 on it. Many of us had all of those things but still ended up with a 6-7.5/10. You are expected to take the question given on the test and synthesis EVERYTHING you have ever learned ever and make it applicable (over exaggerating a bit, but it's how it felt) . Extremely unfair.
Also - clickers. They're meant to be an easy grade boost, but can end up screwing you over. Dense, vague material paired with extremely boring reading. The overall concepts are extremely interesting and made me view the world differently but it was as if it didn't matter because demonstrating it to get a good mark was so difficult. Brubaker isn't very approachable, which makes his lack of transparency and clarity an even bigger barrier. Would not recommend this class.
This has been one of my favorite classes I have taken at UCLA so far. The professor is extremely passionate about the material which keeps the lectures lively and entertaining. The things you learn in this class are very applicable to real life and make you see the world in a different way. I am currently undecided and this class has led me to consider Sociology as my major : )
Ok...So professor Brubaker seems like a nice guy, but this class isn't a shoe in for an A. I went to every lecture, got 100% on the iClicker questions, really understood the material, but got a B+. The tests are long and short answer and THERE IS NO FUCKING RUBRIC! The TAs grade arbitrarily. Like they'll read your answer and decide "this was good, not perfect, 7.5 out of 10." What they don't realize is that by giving out 7.5/10 on basically every question you get a fucking C on the tests. I went in to office hours to figure out how to do better on the test and I didn't really get an answer. Nice guy, boring lectures, mandatory attendance. so.. ya...
Based on 46 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (11)
- Needs Textbook (9)
- Participation Matters (8)