MCD BIO 191

Variable Topics Research Seminars: Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology

1 of 2
Professor Most Helpful Review
1 of 2

PROFESSORS

Ira Clark Full Profile > N/A Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
Ira Clark See Full Profile

Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness N/A

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
Robert Goldberg See Full Profile

Overall 5.0 Easiness 4.0 Workload 4.0 Clarity 5.0 Helpfulness 5.0

Most Helpful Review

Professor Goldberg is an amazing professor. He really wants students to be able to synthesize material that they have learned from other classes and apply it to what is being taught in class. For the seminar, we focused on GMOs and we went from the very basis of how plasmids were made up to current technology. The class was intense because he would always be asking students questions about the paper, so make sure you read the papers in full detail.

Fall Quarter 2018
AD
AD
Amalia Icreverzi See Full Profile

Overall 3.0 Easiness 5.0 Workload 4.0 Clarity 3.0 Helpfulness 3.0

Most Helpful Review

Took MCDB 60 Biomedical Ethics with Professor Icreverzi in 2017 Summer Session A. It's not listed on Bruinwalk so I'll post here instead. She's a nice professor and grades with leniency but she tends to circumlocute on her points and get sidetracked when questions are asked, so she does not often finish her lecture before class ends. Overall the course is easy if you can learn to argue but class tends to be boring for the above reasons.

Summer Quarter 2017
Stephen Jacobsen Full Profile > N/A Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
Stephen Jacobsen See Full Profile

Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness N/A

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
D. Jones Full Profile > N/A Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
D. Jones See Full Profile

Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness N/A

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
Harumi Kasamatsu Full Profile > 2.2 Overall 1.2 Easiness 1.2 Workload 1.8 Clarity 2.5 Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
Harumi Kasamatsu See Full Profile

Overall 2.2 Easiness 1.2 Workload 1.2 Clarity 1.8 Helpfulness 2.5

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
AD
AD
James Lake Full Profile > 2.5 Overall 1.7 Easiness 2.0 Workload 1.8 Clarity 3.7 Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
James Lake See Full Profile

Overall 2.5 Easiness 1.7 Workload 2.0 Clarity 1.8 Helpfulness 3.7

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
Peiyun Lee Full Profile > N/A Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
Peiyun Lee See Full Profile

Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness N/A

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
Chentao Lin Full Profile > 2.6 Overall 1.2 Easiness 1.6 Workload 2.5 Clarity 3.9 Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
Chentao Lin See Full Profile

Overall 2.6 Easiness 1.2 Workload 1.6 Clarity 2.5 Helpfulness 3.9

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
Nathanael Prunet See Full Profile

Overall 2.0 Easiness 2.0 Workload 3.0 Clarity 3.0 Helpfulness 2.0

Most Helpful Review

The topic of this seminar was Plant Development, so if you don't enjoy studying plants, I would really not recommend it. The class consisted of giving a solo 1 hour presentation on a paper you were assigned. Especially without having taken plant development before (I've only taken plant physiology), this class was not very fair. It was difficult to understand majority of the scientific papers without having to google everything, and googling can only get you so far. I thought it was unfair how we were expected to understand papers and then have participation be included in such a huge portion of our grade. I don't understand how anyone would be able to ask/answer questions and discuss without having a strong understanding in any of the topics. In short: plant development shouldn't even be a topic in the MCDB seminars unless MCDB C141 is a prerequisite.

The whole quarter, we weren't updated on our grades as far as what we received on our presentation or pre-presentation outline that we turned in. We received no grades for any of our assignments so you can only imagine how annoying that was, even as the class concluded. On top of that, there was no clear grading criteria such as a rubric for any of the assignments we were given, including the 1 hour presentation which was like 50% of our grade. Overall, I would not recommend this class at all. I would recommend other topics in the seminars because plant development was not very interesting, especially since much of our course backgrounds aren't in plants.

Winter Quarter 2019
AD
AD
1 of 2

It seems like you’re

using an ad blocker. :(


Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!