MIMG 101
Introductory Microbiology
Description: Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Requisites: Life Sciences 3, 4. Historical foundations of microbiology; introduction to bacterial structure, physiology, biochemistry, genetics, and ecology. Letter grading.
Units: 4.0
Units: 4.0
1 of 2
AD
Most Helpful Review
Fall 2021 - Avoid this professor at all costs. Ali pour is nice but she cannot lecture. She just reads off of all the slides, adds absolutely nothing. Sometimes she would barely go over a topic and say we didn't need to know details for the exam, then the exams would feature the same topic in great detail. This class had two professors, Dr. Hill and Ali Pour, Dr. Hill was great but if you want to take MIMG 101 and see Ali Pour as one of the professors I would not recommend taking it. It is very hard to learn from her and she is not understanding about honest mistakes like missing last-minute announcements/deadlines.
Fall 2021 - Avoid this professor at all costs. Ali pour is nice but she cannot lecture. She just reads off of all the slides, adds absolutely nothing. Sometimes she would barely go over a topic and say we didn't need to know details for the exam, then the exams would feature the same topic in great detail. This class had two professors, Dr. Hill and Ali Pour, Dr. Hill was great but if you want to take MIMG 101 and see Ali Pour as one of the professors I would not recommend taking it. It is very hard to learn from her and she is not understanding about honest mistakes like missing last-minute announcements/deadlines.
Most Helpful Review
Winter 2024 - Professor Berthet is honestly one of the best professors I've had at UCLA. She is extremely engaging, approachable, and understanding of her students. She does her best to explain concepts and answer questions during class so that everyone understands, and after our first midterm feedback, she was also clear about what she does and doesn't want us to know. I think the class agreed as a whole that her exams were generally fair. She tests on information from her slides and not the textbook, though I would definitely recommend reading the textbook chapters for a thorough understanding of the concepts, especially to prepare for exam questions that ask you to apply knowledge. Exams consisted of majority multiple choice questions with ~3 free response questions. There were two weekly homework assignments, one from the textbook (you will need to buy/borrow the textbook for these questions) and one on Canvas. I would say the workload is definitely manageable as long as you are consistently going to class and not playing catch up. The homework is graded based on effort instead of correctness so I would highly recommend doing all of them since they're basically free points. Discussion attendance is mandatory and around week 5 we were required to do a group presentation in discussion. Professor Berthet may offer extra credit based on how the class does as a whole, but it wasn't guaranteed. She generally wants an average of 70-75% for every exam. Overall, I would say as long as you do the bare minimum of going to class + turning in all assignments, you will be able to understand all the concepts. If you understand the concepts and can spend a week or so memorizing them before the exams, an A is doable. Professor Berthet wants the best for us and always offers extra office hours or one-on-one meetings if you need more help, so don't be afraid to ask!
Winter 2024 - Professor Berthet is honestly one of the best professors I've had at UCLA. She is extremely engaging, approachable, and understanding of her students. She does her best to explain concepts and answer questions during class so that everyone understands, and after our first midterm feedback, she was also clear about what she does and doesn't want us to know. I think the class agreed as a whole that her exams were generally fair. She tests on information from her slides and not the textbook, though I would definitely recommend reading the textbook chapters for a thorough understanding of the concepts, especially to prepare for exam questions that ask you to apply knowledge. Exams consisted of majority multiple choice questions with ~3 free response questions. There were two weekly homework assignments, one from the textbook (you will need to buy/borrow the textbook for these questions) and one on Canvas. I would say the workload is definitely manageable as long as you are consistently going to class and not playing catch up. The homework is graded based on effort instead of correctness so I would highly recommend doing all of them since they're basically free points. Discussion attendance is mandatory and around week 5 we were required to do a group presentation in discussion. Professor Berthet may offer extra credit based on how the class does as a whole, but it wasn't guaranteed. She generally wants an average of 70-75% for every exam. Overall, I would say as long as you do the bare minimum of going to class + turning in all assignments, you will be able to understand all the concepts. If you understand the concepts and can spend a week or so memorizing them before the exams, an A is doable. Professor Berthet wants the best for us and always offers extra office hours or one-on-one meetings if you need more help, so don't be afraid to ask!
Most Helpful Review
Winter 2023 - Professor Bradley was amazing! One of the best professors I've taken, the course is hard but he made it much more manageable and understandable. I am not a MIMG major and took the course for PA prereqs, but he made his lectures clear and assigned reflection assignments each week as our hmw. Discussions were optional and were used for clarification, there were 3 tests all of the equal weight for % and were non-cumulative, he allowed one-sided notes on an 8x11 paper for every test. they offered regrades for the first two exams but not for the final. There was some extra credit associated with campuswire. Overall this class will take up ALOT of time and require maximal effort to get a good grade. He does curve the overall grade but our class did pretty well on tests (averages were C's) so he may not have curved this time.
Winter 2023 - Professor Bradley was amazing! One of the best professors I've taken, the course is hard but he made it much more manageable and understandable. I am not a MIMG major and took the course for PA prereqs, but he made his lectures clear and assigned reflection assignments each week as our hmw. Discussions were optional and were used for clarification, there were 3 tests all of the equal weight for % and were non-cumulative, he allowed one-sided notes on an 8x11 paper for every test. they offered regrades for the first two exams but not for the final. There was some extra credit associated with campuswire. Overall this class will take up ALOT of time and require maximal effort to get a good grade. He does curve the overall grade but our class did pretty well on tests (averages were C's) so he may not have curved this time.
AD
Most Helpful Review
Winter 2017 - Reading the reviews posted on here before I expected a hellish professor but I have to say the people that wrote about him are crazy. Is the class hard? Yes. Is there a lot of material? Yes. But I liked him a as a lecturer. I found him funny. I even liked learning about the sewage cycle. I don't know why people are berating him about the things he seems to enjoy teaching because his enthusiasm made the potentially dry material actually interesting to me. And I couldn't disagree more with those saying he doesn't seem to care about his students. He even brought in food one day for us to eat and chill out while he discussed fermentation. He may not be the vivacious lecturer, but give him a break, he's old and he's trying his best. I enjoyed this class and him teaching it, and even developed an interest in MIMG because of this class.
Winter 2017 - Reading the reviews posted on here before I expected a hellish professor but I have to say the people that wrote about him are crazy. Is the class hard? Yes. Is there a lot of material? Yes. But I liked him a as a lecturer. I found him funny. I even liked learning about the sewage cycle. I don't know why people are berating him about the things he seems to enjoy teaching because his enthusiasm made the potentially dry material actually interesting to me. And I couldn't disagree more with those saying he doesn't seem to care about his students. He even brought in food one day for us to eat and chill out while he discussed fermentation. He may not be the vivacious lecturer, but give him a break, he's old and he's trying his best. I enjoyed this class and him teaching it, and even developed an interest in MIMG because of this class.
AD
1 of 2
