Joshua Harrison Sparks
Department of Statistics
AD
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Often Funny
  • Gives Extra Credit
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
37.2%
31.0%
24.8%
18.6%
12.4%
6.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks
Loading...

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2025
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 23, 2025

This is a review for the STATS 20 course taught by Professor Sparks.

Professor Sparks is a good lecturer, and he has a lot of enthusiasm when he teaches. He teaches mainly off slides, so it can get dry and boring after some time, but he tries his best to engage the lecture hall when he's teaching. He is also super approachable with questions about the lecture content and about any homework problems. I had a good amount of programming knowledge coming into the class, so I felt that the content was not that hard; however, I felt that the slides were helpful in explaining useful programming concepts and Professor Sparks did a lot of demos in RStudio pertaining to the slide content.

As for examinations, the midterm/final content was basically all of the stuff on his slides. All of the questions are manageable. The only "iff" I have is that he sometimes pulls things that were barely covered in class and puts it on the midterm. It wasn't a big deal in the end because he only asks a couple of questions about those concepts and offers 10 points extra credit (on both the midterm and the final). The final was a little tricky if you didn't have programming experience because it did require to you to write some complex data cleaning algorithms in R, but he did give plenty partial credit. The average was ~80% for both exams.

TLDR; I would take Professor Sparks again. He's a good teacher, explains concepts well, and his examinations are fair (just the content on his slides).

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2025
Grade: A-
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Nov. 19, 2025

The midterm and final were overall not hard if you know basic stats and study the slides that he gives you. I just didn't study for this class at all. Professor is pretty interesting. He tries to keep lecture engaging but lowkey he's pretty quirky.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2025
Grade: A
Dec. 23, 2025

This is a review for the STATS 20 course taught by Professor Sparks.

Professor Sparks is a good lecturer, and he has a lot of enthusiasm when he teaches. He teaches mainly off slides, so it can get dry and boring after some time, but he tries his best to engage the lecture hall when he's teaching. He is also super approachable with questions about the lecture content and about any homework problems. I had a good amount of programming knowledge coming into the class, so I felt that the content was not that hard; however, I felt that the slides were helpful in explaining useful programming concepts and Professor Sparks did a lot of demos in RStudio pertaining to the slide content.

As for examinations, the midterm/final content was basically all of the stuff on his slides. All of the questions are manageable. The only "iff" I have is that he sometimes pulls things that were barely covered in class and puts it on the midterm. It wasn't a big deal in the end because he only asks a couple of questions about those concepts and offers 10 points extra credit (on both the midterm and the final). The final was a little tricky if you didn't have programming experience because it did require to you to write some complex data cleaning algorithms in R, but he did give plenty partial credit. The average was ~80% for both exams.

TLDR; I would take Professor Sparks again. He's a good teacher, explains concepts well, and his examinations are fair (just the content on his slides).

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2025
Grade: A-
Nov. 19, 2025

The midterm and final were overall not hard if you know basic stats and study the slides that he gives you. I just didn't study for this class at all. Professor is pretty interesting. He tries to keep lecture engaging but lowkey he's pretty quirky.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (2)
  • Often Funny
    (2)
  • Gives Extra Credit
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!