Preston Wake
Department of Mathematics
AD
2.7
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 2.9 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.4 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.1 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.3 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Needs Textbook
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Tough Tests

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

28.1%
23.4%
18.8%
14.1%
9.4%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD

Reviews (6)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: B+
Dec. 12, 2016

Wake is a terrible lecturer. I went to every lecture and rarely understood what he was talking about. He went over a lot of proofs that were not relevant to solving the problems.

The tests are multiple choice, with no partial credit. Very similar to the homework, but still difficult.

Discussion is mandatory, with weekly quizzes of one problem from the optional homework (but really- do the homework and memorize the problems and you'll be set.)

Would not recommend.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
April 9, 2016

Professor Wake is a great lecturer. He gives you all of the information you need without going far off topic and without oversimplifying the material. As long as your are actually paying attention to the lectures, you should be fine. The quizzes are from the practice problems which are very easy to neglect and fall behind on, but if you stay on top of them, they should be very easy. The second midterm and final exam were challenging, but one midterm can be dropped so you only need to do well on one of them. He was very responsive to his emails and very helpful in office hours. He seemed to know the answer to the problems off of the top of his head which meant he was fairly dedicated. Overall, a great professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
March 30, 2016

Yes, his class is not that awful, IF, you are that interested in math. For people who are fed up with long proof like me, I just had to teach myself.
Not only is his class boring and messy, he also does not really care about teaching. His exams are perfunctory with no materials given. His TA is LAZY and solves TWO equations every 50 MINUTES. His grades come 2 WEEKS after the exam (seems like after the deadline of changing score?).
So alright, he's acceptable, but I would not take his class again.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
March 30, 2016

Generally I agree with what others said so far. I do think though that people might be a bit too harsh on Wake. Yes, his lectures are kind of a mess, and yes, the lack of partial credit on the exams might be annoying. Yet I still found following his lectures just fine. And the exams all seemed easy and straightforward, except maybe for one question on the final that did require some... creative thinking. Maybe I'm just good enough with numbers to not lose points on computational errors, so that made it easier for me. I still think professor Wake is fine and if you end up with him, it's not the end of the world for you.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
March 19, 2016

If you're halfway decent at math, this class isn't really that bad. It's the fact that Dr. Wake gives multiple choice exams with no partial credit that is ridiculous.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: NR
March 14, 2016

Professor Wake is awful. He is the most awkward man I've ever encountered and it shows in lecture. He doesn't articulate his thoughts well at all and often gets confused while doing a problem on the board. He is very soft spoken and hard to understand. Lecture became useless and I basically had to teach myself the class. Also, his 2 midterms and final were all computational multiple choice questions, which might actually be the worst method possible to gauge a students understanding of high level calculus. You can miss 3 questions (30%) on a test due to arithmetic errors even though you solved the differential equation correctly. Overall, avoid professor Wake at all cost, of the 6 math professors I've had at UCLA he is by far the worst.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: B+
Dec. 12, 2016

Wake is a terrible lecturer. I went to every lecture and rarely understood what he was talking about. He went over a lot of proofs that were not relevant to solving the problems.

The tests are multiple choice, with no partial credit. Very similar to the homework, but still difficult.

Discussion is mandatory, with weekly quizzes of one problem from the optional homework (but really- do the homework and memorize the problems and you'll be set.)

Would not recommend.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
April 9, 2016

Professor Wake is a great lecturer. He gives you all of the information you need without going far off topic and without oversimplifying the material. As long as your are actually paying attention to the lectures, you should be fine. The quizzes are from the practice problems which are very easy to neglect and fall behind on, but if you stay on top of them, they should be very easy. The second midterm and final exam were challenging, but one midterm can be dropped so you only need to do well on one of them. He was very responsive to his emails and very helpful in office hours. He seemed to know the answer to the problems off of the top of his head which meant he was fairly dedicated. Overall, a great professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
March 30, 2016

Yes, his class is not that awful, IF, you are that interested in math. For people who are fed up with long proof like me, I just had to teach myself.
Not only is his class boring and messy, he also does not really care about teaching. His exams are perfunctory with no materials given. His TA is LAZY and solves TWO equations every 50 MINUTES. His grades come 2 WEEKS after the exam (seems like after the deadline of changing score?).
So alright, he's acceptable, but I would not take his class again.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
March 30, 2016

Generally I agree with what others said so far. I do think though that people might be a bit too harsh on Wake. Yes, his lectures are kind of a mess, and yes, the lack of partial credit on the exams might be annoying. Yet I still found following his lectures just fine. And the exams all seemed easy and straightforward, except maybe for one question on the final that did require some... creative thinking. Maybe I'm just good enough with numbers to not lose points on computational errors, so that made it easier for me. I still think professor Wake is fine and if you end up with him, it's not the end of the world for you.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
March 19, 2016

If you're halfway decent at math, this class isn't really that bad. It's the fact that Dr. Wake gives multiple choice exams with no partial credit that is ridiculous.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: NR
March 14, 2016

Professor Wake is awful. He is the most awkward man I've ever encountered and it shows in lecture. He doesn't articulate his thoughts well at all and often gets confused while doing a problem on the board. He is very soft spoken and hard to understand. Lecture became useless and I basically had to teach myself the class. Also, his 2 midterms and final were all computational multiple choice questions, which might actually be the worst method possible to gauge a students understanding of high level calculus. You can miss 3 questions (30%) on a test due to arithmetic errors even though you solved the differential equation correctly. Overall, avoid professor Wake at all cost, of the 6 math professors I've had at UCLA he is by far the worst.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.7
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 2.9 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.4 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.1 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.3 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Needs Textbook
    (4)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (4)
  • Tough Tests
    (4)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!