Sudhakar Pamarti
Department of Electrical Engineering
###### AD
3.1
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.1 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.9 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.1 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

#### TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
20.5%
17.0%
13.6%
10.2%
6.8%
3.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrarâ€™s Office.

23.6%
19.7%
15.7%
11.8%
7.9%
3.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrarâ€™s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

#### Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2018
Grade: B
July 11, 2019

I really disliked Pamarti. Probably the worst professor I've ever had. Every time I see a picture of him I start reaching for the toilet paper to wipe the shit off my monit- oh wait that's Pamarti.

He's just the biggest asshole of all time. Here's a conversation I had with him:

Me: So why didn't I get any points for this question? My setup equations are correct, but I put the R in the numerator instead of the denominator.
P (interrupting loudly): Yes, your setup is correct. I can give you three points (out of 40) for that. Your answer is wrong though.
Me: My answer would be right if I put R in the denominator. Even with my wrong setup, though, all my followup algebra is correct.
P: That's true, but your answer isn't right. You just don't understand the fundamentals. You shouldn't even have done the math, I don't know why you did. You need to go back and learn the basics.
Me (somewhat confused): I was just trying to show my thought process.
P (interrupting again): Yes, but your thought process is wrong. I won't give points for wrong work, even if it's correct work.
And I'm just like ?????????????????? Fuck this guy

Helpful?

Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Jan. 11, 2015

As far as a lecturer, Professor Pamarti was very effective, especially for an introductory circuits class. He was very clear and kept relating the circuit analysis back to the physics. His grading though was not particularly fair. He would take off full credit for not explaining things enough, even though his definition of enough seemed completely arbitrary. He also gives out very few As and A-s, but other then that his grading scale is pretty normal. His test were pretty tough, and they were even worse because they always had lots of errors. He didn't seem to spend much effort on making them readable and correct. Also, he was late getting the final grades in and did not seem to understand that that was not ok. It messed a lot of people up, and he didn't seem to care.

In short, he was a very good lecturer, but pretty bad at every other aspect of being a professor.

Helpful?

Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2018
Grade: B
July 11, 2019

I really disliked Pamarti. Probably the worst professor I've ever had. Every time I see a picture of him I start reaching for the toilet paper to wipe the shit off my monit- oh wait that's Pamarti.

He's just the biggest asshole of all time. Here's a conversation I had with him:

Me: So why didn't I get any points for this question? My setup equations are correct, but I put the R in the numerator instead of the denominator.
P (interrupting loudly): Yes, your setup is correct. I can give you three points (out of 40) for that. Your answer is wrong though.
Me: My answer would be right if I put R in the denominator. Even with my wrong setup, though, all my followup algebra is correct.
P: That's true, but your answer isn't right. You just don't understand the fundamentals. You shouldn't even have done the math, I don't know why you did. You need to go back and learn the basics.
Me (somewhat confused): I was just trying to show my thought process.
P (interrupting again): Yes, but your thought process is wrong. I won't give points for wrong work, even if it's correct work.
And I'm just like ?????????????????? Fuck this guy

Helpful?

Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Jan. 11, 2015

As far as a lecturer, Professor Pamarti was very effective, especially for an introductory circuits class. He was very clear and kept relating the circuit analysis back to the physics. His grading though was not particularly fair. He would take off full credit for not explaining things enough, even though his definition of enough seemed completely arbitrary. He also gives out very few As and A-s, but other then that his grading scale is pretty normal. His test were pretty tough, and they were even worse because they always had lots of errors. He didn't seem to spend much effort on making them readable and correct. Also, he was late getting the final grades in and did not seem to understand that that was not ok. It messed a lot of people up, and he didn't seem to care.

In short, he was a very good lecturer, but pretty bad at every other aspect of being a professor.

Helpful?

Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.1
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.1 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.9 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.1 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

#### TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

## Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!