Tamara Kucherenko
Department of Mathematics
AD
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 5 Users
Easiness 1.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
21.9%
18.2%
14.6%
10.9%
7.3%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 17, 2009

I'll put it this way: if you liked Park, Norberg, Corbin, and Hainline (astro TA), we'd have similar opinions on who teaches well. Kucherenko is added to the list. Explains everything, well-organized, knows her material, pacing is perfect, homework is manageable, and midterms/final is ... well relative. I had an alright time, scoring B+/A-'s, but I see some people had difficulty; probably because they took 32B here (hint: take it at SMC; they combine 32A&B so you'll dominate the first three weeks). Thankfully, I skipped 33A and went ahead to diff equations, which is no bs, concrete, understandable study. Even if you have five classes, I doubt you'd fall behind in her class, not because her 33B is easy (it was, imo), but because you won't find much reason to procrastinate with this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 17, 2009

I'll put it this way: if you liked Park, Norberg, Corbin, and Hainline (astro TA), we'd have similar opinions on who teaches well. Kucherenko is added to the list. Explains everything, well-organized, knows her material, pacing is perfect, homework is manageable, and midterms/final is ... well relative. I had an alright time, scoring B+/A-'s, but I see some people had difficulty; probably because they took 32B here (hint: take it at SMC; they combine 32A&B so you'll dominate the first three weeks). Thankfully, I skipped 33A and went ahead to diff equations, which is no bs, concrete, understandable study. Even if you have five classes, I doubt you'd fall behind in her class, not because her 33B is easy (it was, imo), but because you won't find much reason to procrastinate with this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 5 Users
Easiness 1.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS