Tamara Kucherenko
Department of Mathematics
AD
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 5 Users
Easiness 1.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
21.9%
18.2%
14.6%
10.9%
7.3%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 17, 2009

I'll put it this way: if you liked Park, Norberg, Corbin, and Hainline (astro TA), we'd have similar opinions on who teaches well. Kucherenko is added to the list. Explains everything, well-organized, knows her material, pacing is perfect, homework is manageable, and midterms/final is ... well relative. I had an alright time, scoring B+/A-'s, but I see some people had difficulty; probably because they took 32B here (hint: take it at SMC; they combine 32A&B so you'll dominate the first three weeks). Thankfully, I skipped 33A and went ahead to diff equations, which is no bs, concrete, understandable study. Even if you have five classes, I doubt you'd fall behind in her class, not because her 33B is easy (it was, imo), but because you won't find much reason to procrastinate with this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 17, 2009

I'll put it this way: if you liked Park, Norberg, Corbin, and Hainline (astro TA), we'd have similar opinions on who teaches well. Kucherenko is added to the list. Explains everything, well-organized, knows her material, pacing is perfect, homework is manageable, and midterms/final is ... well relative. I had an alright time, scoring B+/A-'s, but I see some people had difficulty; probably because they took 32B here (hint: take it at SMC; they combine 32A&B so you'll dominate the first three weeks). Thankfully, I skipped 33A and went ahead to diff equations, which is no bs, concrete, understandable study. Even if you have five classes, I doubt you'd fall behind in her class, not because her 33B is easy (it was, imo), but because you won't find much reason to procrastinate with this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 5 Users
Easiness 1.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!